Am I simplifying this surd expression wrong?

How should I simplify (sqrt(50) + 3*sqrt(8))/sqrt(2) – I split the fraction and did sqrt(50)/sqrt(2) -> sqrt(25) and 3*sqrt(8)/sqrt(2) -> 3*sqrt(4), but that feels suspiciously neat so I’m worried I broke a rule (should I be rationalising first or not)? Any help appreciated!

3 Responses

  1. You’re fine: for positive numbers, √a/√b = √(a/b), so there’s no need to rationalise first. Worked example: √50/√2 = √25 = 5 and 3√8/√2 = 3√4 = 6, so (√50 + 3√8)/√2 = 5 + 6 = 11.

  2. You’re safe-no rule broken: rewrite √50 = 5√2 and √8 = 2√2, so (√50 + 3√8)/√2 = (5√2 + 3·2√2)/√2 = (5√2 + 6√2)/√2 = 11√2/√2 = 11.
    Suspiciously neat, yes, but sometimes the surds line up like well-behaved ducks; rationalising isn’t needed here (I think!).

  3. Your method is fine: you can split the fraction because both terms share the same denominator, and you can also use √a/√b = √(a/b) when a,b ≥ 0. So √50/√2 = √(50/2) = √25 = 5, and 3·√8/√2 = 3·√(8/2) = 3·√4 = 6, giving (√50 + 3√8)/√2 = 5 + 6 = 11. Rationalising first isn’t necessary here (you’d just do extra steps and still get 11). As a quick check with a simpler example: √18/√2 = √(18/2) = √9 = 3.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Our Community

Ready to make maths more enjoyable, accessible, and fun? Join a friendly community where you can explore puzzles, ask questions, track your progress, and learn at your own pace.

By becoming a member, you unlock:

  • Access to all community puzzles
  • The Forum for asking and answering questions
  • Your personal dashboard with points & achievements
  • A supportive space built for every level of learner
  • New features and updates as the Hub grows